🛴1/ Scooters are taking over Chicago and the city is not taking it lightly!
But don’t take my word for it, jump on your favorite social media platform to follow the backlash.
🛴2/ If you also reside in a city with scooters, you know that this controversy is not exclusive to Chicago.
Scooters are a great solution for cities, but often solve one set of problems by causing another.
🛴3/ At the core of the conflict is our cities’ infrastructure: it has not yet evolved to meet the needs of scooters.
🛴4/ You know what I’m talking about if you’ve ever driven behind a slow-moving group of scooters. Or if you’ve come across them head-on on a one-way.
If you’ve been on those scooters and were aware of the anxiety you were causing, you know what I’m talking about too.
🛴5/ Cities comprise hard and soft infrastructure. Both are inadequate when it comes to scooters.
Hard → Where’s the best place for me to park outside my friend’s house? The parking space? The sidewalk? [Ah, ok, I’ll just leave it in the street]
Soft → Do I keep to the bike lane at stop signs? How do I make left turns without getting hit?
🛴6/ We see this conflict happen over and over as new technologies emerge
- We identify a problem
- We develop a solution using technology
- We realize the technology does not fit into the existing system
- We make adjustments to the system so that the technology works well
🛴7/ Florent Crivello coined this the “tough tomato principle.” Growers adapted tomatoes so that mechanical harvesters could work.
🛴8/ And like tough tomatoes, our cities will need to adapt.
🛴9/ If scooters persist, I have little doubt that we can adjust our infrastructure, soft and hard, over time.
The clearest analog is Chicago’s bike initiative, Divvy (Ford GoBike in SF, CitiBike in NYC). It impacts the development of our bike lanes, street traffic, and commuting habits.
🛴10/ But for now, our cities are still soft tomatoes.